Return to the home page
 
Clark McNamara Lawyers > News and Articles  
 

 
Clark McNamara Lawyers
Our People
Our Projects
Practice Areas
About Us
News and Articles
Useful Links
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
 15-07-2002 
Director's Duties and the Criminal Code
From 15 December 2001 the Commonwealth Criminal Code applies. The main effects are:
  • A body corporate may now be found guilty of an offence and if the penalty is imprisonment, this penalty can be substituted with a fine.
  • The Code formally indicates that it is no longer appropriate to attribute liability for breach of director duties to the corporation only where a high level officer, considered to be "the directing mind and will" of the corporation, was involved in the offence.
  • The physical element of an offence by an employee, agent or officer, acting within the scope of their employment, or authority must also be attributed to the body corporate.
  • If a body corporate authorised or permitted the individual's commission of an offence, then the fault elements of intention, knowledge or recklessness must also be attributed to the body corporate.
The Code details the means by which authorisation or permission by the body corporate may be established, namely by proving:
(a) that the body corporate's board of directors intentionally, knowingly or recklessly carried out the relevant conduct, or expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised or permitted the commission of the offence; or
(b) that a high managerial agent of the body corporate intentionally, knowingly or recklessly engaged in the relevant conduct, or expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised or permitted the commission of the offence; or
(c) that a corporate culture existed within the body corporate that directed, encouraged, tolerated or led to non-compliance with the relevant provision; or
(d) that the body corporate failed to create and maintain a corporate culture that required compliance with the relevant provision.

This new Code will have a significant impact on corporations.

Facilitating the notion that there can exist a "corporate culture" where non-compliance with the law is expected, it allocates criminal responsibility for such conduct to the corporation as a whole and not just prosecution of one or two officers.


© 2008 Clark McNamara Lawyers