Return to the home page
 
Clark McNamara Lawyers > News and Articles  
 

 
Clark McNamara Lawyers
Our People
Practice Areas
About Us
News and Articles
Useful Links
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
 01-06-2003 

Leases repudiated without notice

Due to the recent decision of Batiste v Lenin in the NSW Court of Appeal, it now appears that tenants may repudiate a lease even though no dispute notice under Section 129 (of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)) complaining of the misdeeds was served.

Section 129 distinguishes between rent and other non-rent covenants. Where a non-rent covenant is breached, the landlord must give notice to the tenant to make good the covenant. Where a rent covenant is breached, the landlord is not required to give notice and may simply re-enter the premises.

The decision creates risks for both landlords and tenants. The landlord may decide to re-enter premises without notice, only to discover that the tenant's conduct does not support a finding of repudiation. The tenant may find that although no notice was served complaining of a breach of covenant, its breaches are nevertheless determined with hindsight to have been so serious that the lease has come to an end.

All lease disputes should be referred to your lawyers so notices can be given or remedial action taken to manage the risks created by this new uncertainty in property law.


© 2008 Clark McNamara Lawyers